CarteaCompare Cars4Runner TRD Off-Road vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

4Runner TRD Off-Road vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

6

4

3990 cc

/

American

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4860 mm

4950 mm

1925 mm

1930 mm

1795 mm

1730 mm

2790 mm

2850 mm

options. L

/

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

20 Km/L

85 L

65 L

7 Km/L

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.0 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

270 BHP

240 BHP - 240 BHP

TBD

Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline

Hybrid & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

In-Line

4.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

None

None

4

4

270 BHP

240 BHP

376 Nm

237 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 4Runner TRD Off-Road

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Stable driving comfort
  • Spacious interior design
  • Advanced safety systems

Negative

  • Moderate engine performance
  • Relatively high price
  • Limitations in storage space

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 4Runner TRD Off-Road if you care more about power; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | 4Runner TRD Off-Road

VS

Honda | Honda Pilot 2023 3.5 Special Edition (AWD)

Toyota | 4Runner TRD Off-Road

VS

Xpeng | G6 RWD Long Range

Toyota | 4Runner TRD Off-Road

VS

Denza | B5 Deluxe

Toyota | 4Runner TRD Off-Road

VS

Honda | Honda Pilot 2023 3.5 EX (2WD)

Toyota | 4Runner TRD Off-Road

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 4Runner TRD Off-Road has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 4Runner TRD Off-Road has a wheelbase of 2790 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 4Runner TRD Off-Road uses Four Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.