5 2WD Standard vs Tiggo 9 Comparison

Car Information

/

192

/

390

/

4820 ×1930 × 1699

/

8.5

/

2.0

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

5 Doors

/

4710 mm

4820

1930 mm

1930

1620 mm

1699

2875 mm

2820

367 L

/

/

16英寸

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

10

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

245/50 R20

/

245/50 R20

Key Spec

0.0 L -

-

220 BHP - 530 BHP

254 - 254

AT

AT & Automatic

Electric & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

295 BHP

254

420 Nm

390

/

2.0

/

Turbocharge

/

192

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 5 2WD Standard

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
    • Child Lock
  • Tiggo 9

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo 9

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 5 2WD Standard if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sport 3.6L

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4)

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2021 3.6L Overland (4x4)

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

VS

Tank | Tank 500 Prestige 2.0T

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2021 2.0T (250 Hp)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 5 2WD Standard has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 9 has a fuel consumption of 8.5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 5 2WD Standard has a wheelbase of 2875 mm, while Tiggo 9 has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5 2WD Standard, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 5 2WD Standard uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 uses Four-Wheel Drive.