500 Business vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4878
4760 mm
1934
1930 mm
1905
1927 mm
2850
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.0
10 Km/L
73
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
front row seats
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Dual SRS, front side and side curtain airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
8
9
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L
342 BHP - 348 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
348 BHP
224 BHP
500
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
500 Business
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool box
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 500 Business if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 500 Business has a fuel consumption of 10, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 500 Business has a wheelbase of 2850, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 500 Business, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 500 Business uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.