5008 Allure vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
193 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4791
4355 mm
1895
1810 mm
1694
1625 mm
6000
2670 mm
348
358 L
Fuel Economy
/
12.5 Km/L
/
63 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
2.0 L
156 BHP - 180
150 BHP
Automatic & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180
150 BHP
132
/
6000
/
300
197 Nm
6000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
5008 Allure
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 5008 Allure if you care more about interior space; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 5008 Allure has a fuel consumption of No data, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 5008 Allure has a wheelbase of 6000 , while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5008 Allure, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 5008 Allure uses No data, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.