5008 GT vs 408 ALLURE Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19
/
4791
/
1895
/
1694
/
2840
/
Fuel Economy
/
14
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
21
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
156 BHP - 180
143 BHP - 215
Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180
215 BHP
132
/
5500
/
300
/
2000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
5008 GT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
408 ALLURE
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick408 ALLURE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 5008 GT if you care more about power; choose 408 ALLURE if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 5008 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while 408 ALLURE has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 5008 GT has a wheelbase of 2840, while 408 ALLURE has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 5008 GT uses No data, while 408 ALLURE uses No data.