5008 GT vs Mazda CX 3 2023 2.0L GS (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19
/
4791
4275
1895
1765
1694
1535
2840
2570
/
240
Fuel Economy
/
15.4
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
21
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1598 L
2.0 L
156 BHP - 180
145 BHP - 148 BHP
Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180
148 BHP
132
/
5500
/
300
192
2000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
5008 GT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Mazda CX 3 2023 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX 3 2023 2.0L GS (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 5008 GT if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX 3 2023 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 5008 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX 3 2023 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 5008 GT has a wheelbase of 2840, while Mazda CX 3 2023 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5008 GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 5008 GT uses No data, while Mazda CX 3 2023 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.