500E 3+1 vs Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
150
/
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
3,630
4196 mm
1,680
1801 mm
1,530
1600 mm
2,320
2601 mm
Fuel Economy
/
12.7 Km/L
/
54 L
/
12.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
10"
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
5 minutes 50 kM
/
Transmission
1-speed automatic (EV)
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
118HP
124 BHP
70
/
220
152 Nm
/
1.6 L
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
122 BHP - 152 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
500E 3+1
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSoul 1.6L MPI A/T STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 500E 3+1 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 500E 3+1 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 500E 3+1 has a wheelbase of 2,320, while Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD has a wheelbase of 2601 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 500E 3+1 uses Front Drive, while Soul 1.6L MPI A/T STD uses Front Wheel Drive.