540C 3.8T Coupe vs AMG GT 63 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
320 km/h
315 km/h
/
8
/
3982 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
2 Seater
2 Seater
4530 mm
4728 mm
2095 mm
1984 mm
1202 mm
1354 mm
2670 mm
2700 mm
144 L
350 L
/
2 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
4 Km/L
9.3 Km/L
4 Km/L
/
80 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.8 L
4.0 L - 4.0 L
533 BHP
429 HP - 831 hp
Automatic
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed & Automatic & SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 Seater - 4
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.8 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
533 BHP
577 BHP
540 Nm
800 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
540C 3.8T Coupe
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
AMG GT 63 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick540C 3.8T Coupe
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 540C 3.8T Coupe if you care more about price; choose AMG GT 63 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 540C 3.8T Coupe has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 25. Therefore, 540C 3.8T Coupe is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 540C 3.8T Coupe has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG GT 63 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 540C 3.8T Coupe uses Rear Wheel Drive, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.