540C 3.8T Coupe vs DBS 5.2T V12 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
320 km/h
340 km/h
Dimensions
2 Seater
4 Seater
4530 mm
4712 mm
2095 mm
1942 mm
1202 mm
1280 mm
2670 mm
2805 mm
144 L
/
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
8.2 Km/L
9.3 Km/L
8.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.8 L
5.2 L
533 BHP
715 BHP - 770 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.8 L
5.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
533 BHP
715 BHP
540 Nm
900 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
540C 3.8T Coupe
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
DBS 5.2T V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDBS 5.2T V12
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 540C 3.8T Coupe if you care more about fuel economy; choose DBS 5.2T V12 if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 540C 3.8T Coupe has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while DBS 5.2T V12 has a fuel consumption of 12.2. Therefore, 540C 3.8T Coupe is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 540C 3.8T Coupe has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while DBS 5.2T V12 has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DBS 5.2T V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 540C 3.8T Coupe uses Rear Wheel Drive, while DBS 5.2T V12 uses Rear Wheel Drive.