812 GTS 6.5L V12 vs 765LT 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
340 km/h
330 km/h
Dimensions
2 Seater
2 Seater
4693 mm
4600 mm
1971 mm
2045 mm
1276 mm
1159 mm
2720 mm
2670 mm
210 L
/
Fuel Economy
92 L
72 L
/
7.7 Km/L
/
7.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.5 L
4.0 L
800 BHP
755 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
6.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
800 BHP
755 BHP
718 Nm
800 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
812 GTS 6.5L V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
765LT 4.0T V8
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick765LT 4.0T V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 812 GTS 6.5L V12 if you care more about interior space; choose 765LT 4.0T V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 812 GTS 6.5L V12 has a fuel consumption of No data, while 765LT 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 12.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 812 GTS 6.5L V12 has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while 765LT 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 812 GTS 6.5L V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 812 GTS 6.5L V12 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while 765LT 4.0T V8 uses Rear Wheel Drive.