CarteaCompare Cars900 2.0T Ultra vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

900 2.0T Ultra vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison

Car Information

4.6

10.9

/

Engine / Motor

240

170

4

4

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4.314

1999

1.809

1810

1.624

3160

2.585

/

/

448

Fuel Economy

/

17.2

/

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

530 BHP - 540 BHP

112 BHP - 168

DHT

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

6

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Petrol

540 BHP

112 BHP

1038

150

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick900 2.0T Ultra

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 900 2.0T Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.