CarteaCompare CarsA 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback vs S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback vs S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

225 km/h

250 km/h

4

4

1990 cc

1995 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

4 Doors

4447 mm

4492 mm

1797 mm

1816 mm

1407 mm

1425 mm

2729 mm

2521 mm

104 m

185 m

/

455 L

Fuel Economy

15 Km/L

10 Km/L

50 L

50 L

15 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Leather

Digital

/

Dual Zone

Dual Zone

Electric

Electric

Standard

Standard

Safety

Infotainment

10.6

9

Android LCD

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.0 L

306 BHP

290 BHP

Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

LED

LED

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

None

Single Turbo

4

4

306 BHP

290 BHP

400 Nm

400 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickS3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback if you care more about fuel economy; choose S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

VS

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

VS

Zeekr | Zeekr 001 Flagship AWD

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

VS

Zeekr | 001 Premium AWD

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

VS

Zeekr | Zeekr 001 Performance AWD

Mercedes Benz | A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback

VS

Zeekr | 001 Privilege AWD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a wheelbase of 2521 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. A 35 AMG 4MATIC Hatchback uses All Wheel Drive, while S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback uses All Wheel Drive.