A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) vs Jaguar XJ 2018 3.0L SC Luxury SWB (340 PS) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
233 km/h
250
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4939 mm
5.130
1886 mm
1.899
1457 mm
1.460
2924 mm
3.032
530 L
520
/
✓
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
11.0
63 L
80
16.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L - 5.0 L
180 BHP - 560 BHP
235 BHP - 570 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
190 BHP
335 BHP
320 Nm
450
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
A6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Jaguar XJ 2018 3.0L SC Luxury SWB (340 PS)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickA6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) if you care more about price; choose Jaguar XJ 2018 3.0L SC Luxury SWB (340 PS) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.99, while Jaguar XJ 2018 3.0L SC Luxury SWB (340 PS) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a wheelbase of 2924 mm, while Jaguar XJ 2018 3.0L SC Luxury SWB (340 PS) has a wheelbase of 3.032. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Jaguar XJ 2018 3.0L SC Luxury SWB (340 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive.