ACADIA SLE / SLT vs F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

217 km/h

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

22"

/

4,883

4746 mm

1,939

2070 mm

1,805

1664 mm

2,858

2874 mm

/

650 L

Fuel Economy

9-10

13.5 Km/L

71

63 L

/

13.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Driver Seat

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Forward Collision Alert

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

12

/

BOSE

/

Transmission

9-speed automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Lifted Suspension

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.6 L

2.0 L - 5.0 L

288 BHP - 328 BHP

246 BHP - 550 BHP

8-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.6L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Naturally Aspirated

/

V6 Engine

/

310 HP

246 BHP

366 Nm

365 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ACADIA SLE / SLT

    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickACADIA SLE / SLT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ACADIA SLE / SLT if you care more about price; choose F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

GMC | ACADIA SLE / SLT

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

GMC | ACADIA SLE / SLT

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

GMC | ACADIA SLE / SLT

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

GMC | ACADIA SLE / SLT

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

GMC | ACADIA SLE / SLT

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ACADIA SLE / SLT has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ACADIA SLE / SLT has a wheelbase of 2,858, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ACADIA SLE / SLT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) uses All Wheel Drive.