ACADIA SLE / SLT vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
22"
/
4,883
5115 mm
1,939
1980 mm
1,805
1920 mm
2,858
2890 mm
/
5 Doors
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
9-10
9.4 Km/L
71
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Driver Seat
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Forward Collision Alert
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
12
6
BOSE
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Lifted Suspension
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.6 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
288 BHP - 328 BHP
240 BHP - 409
8-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
V
3.6L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
V6 Engine
/
310 HP
271 BHP
366 Nm
385 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ACADIA SLE / SLT
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ACADIA SLE / SLT if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ACADIA SLE / SLT has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ACADIA SLE / SLT has a wheelbase of 2,858, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ACADIA SLE / SLT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.