Alphard Executive Lounge vs 735 Li Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
6
/
3456 cc
/
Japanese
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
5005 mm
5391
1850 mm
1950
1945 mm
1544
3000 mm
3215
/
540
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
7.9
85 L
74
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.5 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
296 BHP
258 - 523
TBD
8-speed automatic (Steptronic Sport) & 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission (Steptronic) & 8-speed Steptronic Automatic & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
3.0
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
296 BHP
286 BHP
391 Nm
425
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Alphard Executive Lounge
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
735 Li
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Luxurious interior and exterior design
- Innovative technology and advanced systems
- Powerful performance and multiple choice engines
Negative
- High price of models and categories
- Above-average fuel consumption
- High maintenance costs
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick735 Li
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Alphard Executive Lounge if you care more about fuel economy; choose 735 Li if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Alphard Executive Lounge has a fuel consumption of 10, while 735 Li has a fuel consumption of 12.66. Therefore, Alphard Executive Lounge is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Alphard Executive Lounge has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while 735 Li has a wheelbase of 3215. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 735 Li, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Alphard Executive Lounge uses Front Wheel Drive, while 735 Li uses No data.