Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4771 mm
4440 mm
1870 mm
1833 mm
1828 mm
1560 mm
2790 mm
2700 mm
/
330 L
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
/
60 L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.8 L
215 BHP
130 BHP - 133 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
215 BHP
130 BHP
280 Nm
170 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, GS Sport 1.8L Classic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.