Alreem 2.0T Standard (RWD) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4771 mm
4341 mm
1870 mm
1804 mm
1828 mm
1693 mm
2790 mm
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
72 L
50 L
10 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
215 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
215 BHP
115 BHP
280 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Alreem 2.0T Standard (RWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Alreem 2.0T Standard (RWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Alreem 2.0T Standard (RWD) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Alreem 2.0T Standard (RWD) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T Standard (RWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Alreem 2.0T Standard (RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.