Alsvin Basic vs Pegas 1.4L M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
170 km/h
/
1368 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
14
/
4
4 Doors
4390
4300 mm
1725
1700 mm
1468
1460 mm
2535
2570 mm
/
475 L
/
150 mm
Fuel Economy
/
13
45
43 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
2
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
8
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
2
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
DCT
/
5
/
DCT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.4 L - 1.4 L
105 BHP
93 BHP - 95
Automatic & DCT
3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
/
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
95 BHP
145
133 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Alsvin Basic
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Pegas 1.4L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlsvin Basic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Alsvin Basic if you care more about price; choose Pegas 1.4L M/T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Alsvin Basic has a fuel consumption of No data, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Alsvin Basic has a wheelbase of 2535, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pegas 1.4L M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Alsvin Basic uses Front Wheel Drive, while Pegas 1.4L M/T uses Front Drive.