Alsvin Full Option vs B70 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
14
18
4
/
4390
4810
1725
1840
1468
1455
2535
/
/
/
/
1440
Fuel Economy
/
17
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Safety
/
/
2
Driver & Passenger Front and Side Airbags, Front & Rear Integrated Side Safety Curtain Airbag
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12.3
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
✓
4
6
Transmission
DCT
/
5
/
DCT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 T - 2.0 T
105 BHP - 105 BHP
168 - 214
Automatic & DCT
6AT & 7DCT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
Chrome
/
Electric
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 T
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
168 BHP
145
258
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Alsvin Full Option
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
B70 Premium
- 360 Degree Camera
- Heater
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlsvin Full Option
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Alsvin Full Option if you care more about price; choose B70 Premium if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Alsvin Full Option has a fuel consumption of No data, while B70 Premium has a fuel consumption of 5.88. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Alsvin Full Option has a wheelbase of 2535, while B70 Premium has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Alsvin Full Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while B70 Premium uses Front Drive.