ALTIMA S 2.5L vs 03 Hyper Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
250
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1440
1560
16
/
4
/
4900
4684
1852
1843
2825
2730
/
1460
Fuel Economy
16.4
17
61
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
5
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
front row seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
10
/
✓
Transmission
CVTS
7DCT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Independent Strut Front Suspension
MacPherson Strut
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
Vented Disc
/
Disc
/
/
225/45 R18
/
225/45 R18
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L
179 BHP - 270 BHP
218 BHP
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
7DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DOHC
Drive-E 2.0TD T4 Evo Turbo
4
/
188 BHP
218 BHP
188hp @ 6000 rpm
/
244
325
244 Nm torque @ 3600 rpm
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ALTIMA S 2.5L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
03 Hyper Pro
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ALTIMA S 2.5L if you care more about interior space; choose 03 Hyper Pro if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while 03 Hyper Pro has a fuel consumption of 5.88. Therefore, 03 Hyper Pro is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2825, while 03 Hyper Pro has a wheelbase of 2730. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ALTIMA S 2.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ALTIMA S 2.5L uses Front Drive, while 03 Hyper Pro uses Front Drive.