ALTIMA S 2.5L vs C 63 AMG Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
1440
/
16
/
4
/
4900
/
1852
/
2825
/
Fuel Economy
16.4
/
61
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
Interior
5
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVTS
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Independent Strut Front Suspension
/
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Vented Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2500 L
TBD
188 BHP - 248 BHP
TBD
CVT & CVTS
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
DOHC
/
4
/
188 BHP
/
188hp @ 6000 rpm
/
244
/
244 Nm torque @ 3600 rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ALTIMA S 2.5L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
C 63 AMG
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC 63 AMG
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ALTIMA S 2.5L if you care more about overall equipment; choose C 63 AMG if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while C 63 AMG has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2825, while C 63 AMG has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ALTIMA S 2.5L uses Front Drive, while C 63 AMG uses No data.