ALTIMA S 2.5L vs E300 3.0L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

260 km/h

/

4

/

2998 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

1440

/

16

/

4

4 Doors

4900

4949 mm

1852

1880 mm

2825

2961 mm

/

1480 mm

/

540 L

Fuel Economy

16.4

9 Km/L

61

66 L

/

9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Manual

/

Interior

5

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Cloth

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

/

/

Safety

Dual Front Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

CVTS

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Independent Strut Front Suspension

/

Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension

/

Wheels/brakes

Vented Disc

/

Disc

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.5 L

2.0 L - 3.0 L

179 BHP - 270 BHP

204 BHP - 285 BHP

Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

4 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

3.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

DOHC

/

4

4

188 BHP

285 BHP

188hp @ 6000 rpm

/

244

420 Nm

244 Nm torque @ 3600 rpm

/

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ALTIMA S 2.5L

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • E300 3.0L

    • Remote key types

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Excellent driving comfort
  • Economical fuel efficiency
  • Advanced security systems

Negative

  • Average motive power performance
  • Improvement of internal materials
  • Noise insulation needs to be developed

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickALTIMA S 2.5L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ALTIMA S 2.5L if you care more about price; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | ALTIMA S 2.5L

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Malibu 2022 1.5L Turbo Premier

Nissan | ALTIMA S 2.5L

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Malibu 2021 1.5L Turbo Premier

Nissan | ALTIMA S 2.5L

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Malibu 2020 1.5L Turbo Premier

Nissan | ALTIMA S 2.5L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2021 3.6L SXT (Base)

Nissan | ALTIMA S 2.5L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Camry 2024 2.5L GLE HEV

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, ALTIMA S 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2825, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ALTIMA S 2.5L uses Front Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.