ALTIMA SL 2.5L vs S 400 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
1500/1553
/
19
/
4
/
4900
/
1852
/
2825
/
Fuel Economy
16.4-17.6
/
61
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather Appointed
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags Seat-mounted side-impact supplemental air bags for front- and rear-seat outboard occupants Roof-mounted curtain side-impact supplemental air bags with rollover sensor for front-and rear-seat outboard occupant head protection
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
BOSE
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Independent Strut Front Suspension
/
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Vented Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
3.0 L - 4.0 L
179 BHP - 270 BHP
272 hp - 508 BHP
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
7-speed / 9-speed & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
DOHC
/
4
/
188 BHP
/
188hp @ 6000 rpm
/
244/380
/
244 Nm torque @ 3600 rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L1
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ALTIMA SL 2.5L
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
S 400
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ALTIMA SL 2.5L if you care more about overall equipment; choose S 400 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ALTIMA SL 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while S 400 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ALTIMA SL 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2825, while S 400 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ALTIMA SL 2.5L uses Front Drive, while S 400 uses No data.