CarteaCompare CarsArmada 5.6L SE vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD

Armada 5.6L SE vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

240 km/h

240 km/h

8

6

5599 cc

3500 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

7 Seater

8 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

5255 mm

5334 mm

2001 mm

2006 mm

1976 mm

1930 mm

3130 mm

3111 mm

566 L

530 L

210 m

250 m

Fuel Economy

6 Km/L

11 Km/L

105 L

88 L

6 Km/L

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

5.6 L

3.5 L - 5.4 L

360 BHP

300 BHP - 440

Automatic

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

Diesel

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

6 Seater - 8

Engine

V

V

5.6 L

3.5 L

Diesel

Gasoline

None

Twin Turbo

4

4

360 BHP

380 BHP

584 Nm

637 Nm

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Armada 5.6L SE

    • Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Spacious interior space
    • Excellent towing ability
    • Comfort and ride quality

    Negative

    • Fuel consumption is high
    • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
    • The initial purchase price is high

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickExpedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Armada 5.6L SE if you care more about interior space; choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Nissan | Armada 5.6L SE

    VS

    Audi | Q6 e-tron

    Nissan | Armada 5.6L SE

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2022 Base

    Nissan | Armada 5.6L SE

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2021 Base

    Nissan | Armada 5.6L SE

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2021 5.6L LE Platinum City

    Nissan | Armada 5.6L SE

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2020 5.6L LE Platinum City

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Armada 5.6L SE has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Armada 5.6L SE has a wheelbase of 3130 mm, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Armada 5.6L SE, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Armada 5.6L SE uses All Wheel Drive, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.