Arrizo 3 1.5L Basic vs Cerato 1.6L SX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4450 mm
/
1748 mm
/
1493 mm
/
2570 mm
/
502 L
/
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
15
42 L
/
14.7 Km/L
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
107 BHP
122 BHP - 161 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
107 BHP
128 BHP
140 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Arrizo 3 1.5L Basic
Cerato 1.6L SX
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Related comparisons
Editor's PickArrizo 3 1.5L Basic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Arrizo 3 1.5L Basic if you care more about price; choose Cerato 1.6L SX if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Arrizo 3 1.5L Basic has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Cerato 1.6L SX has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, Cerato 1.6L SX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Arrizo 3 1.5L Basic has a wheelbase of 2570 mm, while Cerato 1.6L SX has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Arrizo 3 1.5L Basic uses Front Wheel Drive, while Cerato 1.6L SX uses No data.