ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Captiva LS Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4355 mm

/

1810 mm

/

1625 mm

/

2670 mm

/

358 L

1051L

/

18

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

/

63 L

/

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

Interior

/

3.5

/

/

diagonal display

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Safety

/

2 Front and sides

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

Transmission

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

Mcpherson

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 3.0 L

150 - 150

144 BHP - 264 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

HALOGEN

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 T

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

144 BHP

197 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Manual

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Captiva LS

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCaptiva LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about power; choose Captiva LS if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive.