ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

180

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4355 mm

4655

1810 mm

1835

1625 mm

1760

2670 mm

2750

358 L

/

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

10.2

63 L

52

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5 L - 3.0 L

150 BHP

144 BHP - 264 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

149 BHP

197 Nm

255

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickChevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about fuel economy; choose Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Geely | EX5 Pro

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Hongqi | HS3 1.5T Luxury

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Peugeot | 2008 GT

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

JAC | JS6 Flagship

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Jetour | X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T LS uses Front Wheel Drive.