CarteaCompare CarsASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs G6 RWD Standard Range

ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs G6 RWD Standard Range Comparison

Car Information

/

435 km

/

66 kWh

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

200

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4355 mm

4753

1810 mm

1920

1625 mm

1650

2670 mm

2890

358 L

571L (1,374L with rear seats folded)

/

2025

/

19

/

5

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

/

63 L

/

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

10.2

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Digital

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

Front and Rear

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.96

/

/

/

/

/

/

18

Battery/Charging

/

CCS2

/

20min = 10-80% SOC

/

215

/

7.5(5-100%)

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Rear Multi-link Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

150 - 150

280 BHP - 470 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5

/

TBD

/

435 - 570

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

150 BHP

280 BHP

197 Nm

/

Motor

/

440

/

1

/

175

/

LFP

/

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

/

210

/

280

Technologies

/

/

5

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • G6 RWD Standard Range

    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Remote key types
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose G6 RWD Standard Range if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2890. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G6 RWD Standard Range, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while G6 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.