ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs GLC 200 4Matic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
193 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4355 mm
4656
1810 mm
1890
1625 mm
1639
2670 mm
2873
358 L
550
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
7.1
63 L
66
12.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
150 - 150
211 BHP - 255
Automatic & CVT
9-speed automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
211 BHP
197 Nm
350
Comparison of configuration highlights
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
GLC 200 4Matic
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose GLC 200 4Matic if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while GLC 200 4Matic has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while GLC 200 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLC 200 4Matic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while GLC 200 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive.