CarteaCompare CarsASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs HS 1.5 DCT DEL

ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs HS 1.5 DCT DEL Comparison

Car Information

/

6.9

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

210

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4355 mm

4630

1810 mm

1890

1625 mm

1663

2670 mm

2750

358 L

507

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

13.5

63 L

55

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

/

DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

150 - 150

127 - 231

Automatic & CVT

9AT & Automatic & DCT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

172

197 Nm

275

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • HS 1.5 DCT DEL

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose HS 1.5 DCT DEL if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while HS 1.5 DCT DEL has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, HS 1.5 DCT DEL is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while HS 1.5 DCT DEL has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 1.5 DCT DEL, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while HS 1.5 DCT DEL uses Front Wheel Drive.