ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
193 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4355 mm
4709 mm
1810 mm
1897 mm
1625 mm
1745 mm
2670 mm
2705 mm
358 L
331 L
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
63 L
55 L
12.5 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.4 L - 3.0 L
150 - 150
165 BHP - 236 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
181 BHP
197 Nm
245 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Related comparisons
Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive.