CarteaCompare CarsASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs RX5 1.5T STD

ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison

Car Information

/

9.4

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

190 km/h

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4355 mm

4571 mm

1810 mm

1855 mm

1625 mm

1719 mm

2670 mm

2708 mm

358 L

430 L

/

18

/

145

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

14.7 Km/L

63 L

55 L

12.5 Km/L

14.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

2

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.1

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

Transmission

/

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

225/50 R18

/

225/50 R18

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

150 - 150

169 BHP - 220 BHP

Automatic & CVT

7DCT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

171 BHP

197 Nm

275 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • RX5 1.5T STD

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance
  • Spacious internal storage capacity
  • High quality interior materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is higher than expected
  • Relatively old navigation technologies
  • Off-road driving comfort is limited

Related comparisons

Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, RX5 1.5T STD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX5 1.5T STD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive.