ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Sonet 1.0T GDI A/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
193 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4355 mm
3995 mm
1810 mm
1790 mm
1625 mm
1647 mm
2670 mm
2500 mm
358 L
392 L
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
/
63 L
45 L
12.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.0 L - 1.5 L
150 - 150
113 BHP - 120 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
120 BHP
197 Nm
172 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Sonet 1.0T GDI A/T
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced technology and security systems
Negative
- Limited background storage space
- Average engine performance
- Noticeable noise at high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSonet 1.0T GDI A/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about interior space; choose Sonet 1.0T GDI A/T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Sonet 1.0T GDI A/T has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Sonet 1.0T GDI A/T has a wheelbase of 2500 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Sonet 1.0T GDI A/T uses Front Wheel Drive.