Atto 3 Premium vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
200 km/h
Chinese
Chinese
/
4
/
1998 cc
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215/55R18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4455 mm
4760 mm
2050 mm
1930 mm
1615 mm
1927 mm
2720 mm
2750 mm
440 L
400 L
205 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
5
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
Automatic Anti-Glare
/
RCW
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
8
9
Battery/Charging
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
/
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
201 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
AT & DHT
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid
420 km
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
201 BHP
224 BHP
310 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Motor
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Atto 3 Premium
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.