Atto 3 Premium vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

7.3S

/

420

/

60.48 kW/h

/

14.9

/

Engine / Motor

160 km/h

/

Chinese

GCC

/

4

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

215/55R18

/

5 Doors

5 Doors

4455 mm

4950 mm

2050 mm

1930 mm

1615 mm

1730 mm

2720 mm

2850 mm

440 L

/

205 mm

/

Fuel Economy

/

20 Km/L

/

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

5

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

LCD

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

Automatic Anti-Glare

/

RCW

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

8

/

Battery/Charging

AC (7KW) DC (80KW)

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

201 BHP

240 - 240

AT & DHT

CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Electric

Hybrid

420 km

/

5

7 - 7

/

2.5 L - 2.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Hybrid

201 BHP

240 BHP

310 Nm

237 Nm

/

In-Line

/

2.5 L

/

None

/

4

Motor

9

/

BYD Blade Battery (LFP)

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Atto 3 Premium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about overall equipment; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

VS

JAC | JAC S3 2024 1.6L Intelligent

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

VS

JAC | JAC S3 2023 1.6L Intelligent

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.