Atto 3 Premium vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5
215/55R18
/
5 Doors
/
4455 mm
/
2050 mm
/
1615 mm
/
2720 mm
/
440 L
514
205 mm
/
/
64
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
5
11.9
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Dinamica Microfibre
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic Anti-Glare
/
RCW
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
14.5
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Battery/Charging
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
11
/
270
/
10 min
Transmission
DHT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
201 BHP
TBD
AT & DHT
DHT
Electric
Electric
420 km
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
201 BHP
/
310 Nm
/
/
/
Motor
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Lithium-ion
/
489
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Atto 3 Premium
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about price; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.