Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) vs Mazda CX9 2021 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
208
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4191
5.075
1794
1.969
1508
1.716
2601
2.930
405
407
/
✓
Fuel Economy
18.5
11.8
50
74
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.5 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
116 BHP - 150 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
150 BHP
230 BHP
250
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda CX9 2021 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX9 2021 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.41, while Mazda CX9 2021 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) has a wheelbase of 2601, while Mazda CX9 2021 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2021 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.