Audi Q3 2019 35 TFSI Design quattro (180 HP) vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
7.6
/
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
217
/
4
N/A
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
✓
/
4.385
5.075
2.019
1.969
1.608
1.716
2.603
2.930
460
/
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
64
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
150 BHP - 220 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
180 BHP
226 BHP
320
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Audi Q3 2019 35 TFSI Design quattro (180 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Audi Q3 2019 35 TFSI Design quattro (180 HP) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Audi Q3 2019 35 TFSI Design quattro (180 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Audi Q3 2019 35 TFSI Design quattro (180 HP) has a wheelbase of 2.603, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Audi Q3 2019 35 TFSI Design quattro (180 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.