AX7 E1 vs Tang L EV 670 Standard Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1496 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5

7

1600

/

5 Doors

/

4660

5040

1880

1996

1690

1760

2715

2950

565 L

/

190 mm

/

Fuel Economy

15.1

/

60 L

/

13 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

7

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

Transmission

AT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

/

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Wheels/brakes

/

225/60 R18

/

225/60 R18

/

/

Key Spec

1.5

/

188 BHP

680 BHP

AT

DHT

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5

7

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5

/

Gasoline

Electric

Single Turbo

/

4

/

188 BHP

680 BHP

300 Nm

/

Technologies

/

ECO/ SPORT

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • AX7 E1

    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
  • Tang L EV 670 Standard

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickTang L EV 670 Standard

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose AX7 E1 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tang L EV 670 Standard if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Dongfeng | AX7 E1

    VS

    Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Innovation

    Dongfeng | AX7 E1

    VS

    Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

    Dongfeng | AX7 E1

    VS

    Dongfeng | AX7 E1

    Dongfeng | AX7 E1

    VS

    Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2024 1.6L Active+ (115HP)

    Dongfeng | AX7 E1

    VS

    Mazda | Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, AX7 E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.62, while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, AX7 E1 has a wheelbase of 2715, while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tang L EV 670 Standard, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AX7 E1 uses Front Drive, while Tang L EV 670 Standard uses No data.