AX7 E2 vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
/
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1600
/
19
/
5 Doors
/
4660
4574 mm
1880
1876 mm
1690
1685 mm
2715
2720 mm
565 L
463 L
190 mm
/
Fuel Economy
15.1
12.2 Km/L
60 L
55 L
13 Km/L
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Double Wishbone Independent Suspension
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
225/55 R19
/
225/55 R19
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.0 L - 2.0 L
188 BHP
127 - 231
AT
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
188 BHP
231 BHP
300 Nm
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
ECO/ SPORT
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
AX7 E2
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
HS 2.0T Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose AX7 E2 if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, AX7 E2 has a fuel consumption of 6.62, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, AX7 E2 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, AX7 E2 has a wheelbase of 2715, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AX7 E2 uses Front Drive, while HS 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.