B10 510 Comfort vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

510

≥400

/

6.5

/

160+160

Engine / Motor

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4515

5209

1885

2010

1655

1731

2735

3110

Comfort

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Interior

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Safety

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Infotainment

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

✓

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

180 BHP

429 BHP - 543

DHT

Automatic & Automatic (Single-speed)

Electric

Electric

TBD

320 km

5

6 - 7 Seater

Engine

/

0.0 L

Electric

Electric

180 BHP

429 BHP

/

600

Exterior

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Technologies

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • B10 510 Comfort

    • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Keyless Entry
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Door Edge Protector
      • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Auto Door Lock
      • Spare Wheel
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickB10 510 Comfort

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose B10 510 Comfort if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    SERES | 5 2WD Standard

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    SERES | 5 4WD Premium

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, B10 510 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, B10 510 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2735, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. B10 510 Comfort uses No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.