CarteaCompare CarsB10 510 Comfort vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

B10 510 Comfort vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Car Information

510

/

8.0

Engine / Motor

/

185

/

3

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4515

4.314

1885

1.809

1655

1.624

2735

2.585

/

448

Fuel Economy

/

17.2

/

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

180 BHP

112 BHP - 168

DHT

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5

5 Seater

/

1.3 L - 1.5 L

/

TBD

Engine

/

1.3 L

Electric

Petrol

180 BHP

160 BHP

/

230

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • B10 510 Comfort

    • MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

      • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
      • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Rear Defogger
      • Push Button Start
      • Temperature Display
      • Keyless Entry
      • Welcome Light
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Active Bonnet
      • Collision Detection
      • Auto Door Lock
      • Spare Wheel
      • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
      • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Modern and attractive exterior design
    • Economical fuel consumption
    • Competitive price compared to specifications

    Negative

    • Average interior material quality
    • Engine performance is limited by power
    • The lack of some advanced security systems

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickB10 510 Comfort

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose B10 510 Comfort if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    Leapmotor | B10 510 Comfort

    VS

    Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, B10 510 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, B10 510 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2735, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, B10 510 Comfort, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. B10 510 Comfort uses No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.