Baleno 1.5L GL vs CTS 2.0L Turbo Base Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

240 km/h

4

/

1462 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

965/985

/

15

/

4

/

3990

4966 mm

1745

1834 mm

1500

1453 mm

2520

2911 mm

355 L

388 L

150

/

Fuel Economy

22.7

9.4 Km/L

37 L

72 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

Interior

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

SRS front

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

/

/

/

4

/

Transmission

4AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.4 L - 1373 L

/

91 BHP - 103 BHP

/

4AT & Automatic

/

Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

5 Seater

/

Exterior

/

/

Halogen

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

103 BHP

268 BHP

138

400 Nm

Technologies

/

Auto

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Baleno 1.5L GL

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
  • CTS 2.0L Turbo Base

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCTS 2.0L Turbo Base

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Baleno 1.5L GL if you care more about fuel economy; choose CTS 2.0L Turbo Base if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Suzuki | Baleno 1.5L GL

VS

Nissan | Nissan Maxima 2023 3.5L SV

Suzuki | Baleno 1.5L GL

VS

Honda | Honda Accord 2023 1.5T EX

Suzuki | Baleno 1.5L GL

VS

Honda | Honda Accord 2024 1.5T EX

Suzuki | Baleno 1.5L GL

VS

Nissan | Nissan Maxima 2022 3.5L SV

Suzuki | Baleno 1.5L GL

VS

Infiniti | Infiniti Q50 2020 3.0T Luxe

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Baleno 1.5L GL has a fuel consumption of 4.41, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Baleno 1.5L GL is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Baleno 1.5L GL has a wheelbase of 2520, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a wheelbase of 2911 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CTS 2.0L Turbo Base, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Baleno 1.5L GL uses Front Drive, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base uses Rear Wheel Drive.