Bentayga 4.0L V8 EWB Azure vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
290 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5305 mm
4341 mm
2010 mm
1804 mm
1739 mm
1693 mm
3175 mm
2676 mm
484 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
8.8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
85 L
50 L
8.8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L - 6.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
542 BHP - 626 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
4.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
542 BHP
115 BHP
770 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Bentayga 4.0L V8 EWB Azure
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Bentayga 4.0L V8 EWB Azure if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Bentayga 4.0L V8 EWB Azure has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Bentayga 4.0L V8 EWB Azure has a wheelbase of 3175 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bentayga 4.0L V8 EWB Azure, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Bentayga 4.0L V8 EWB Azure uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.