Binray Basic vs HAN AWD Comparison

Car Information

/

85.4

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5

4680

4995 mm

1785

1910 mm

1460

1495 mm

2670

2920 mm

470

410 L

/

19

/

4 Doors

/

125 mm

Fuel Economy

20.8

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Nappa Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Front, Side and Curtain Airbags With Driver Knee (11 Total)

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

15.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

/

Dynaudio

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

/

MacPhersen electronically adjustable damper

/

Multi-link electronically adjustable damper

Wheels/brakes

/

Front Brembo© Sport caliper with perforated brake disc

/

Ventilated Disc

Key Spec

1.0

/

134 BHP

241 BHP - 509 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5

5

/

TBD

/

521 km

Engine

1.0

/

Gasoline

Electric

134 BHP

509 BHP

/

700 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

700

/

12

/

BYD Blade Battery (LFP)

/

509

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Binray Basic

    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • HAN AWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBinray Basic

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Binray Basic if you care more about price; choose HAN AWD if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Geely | Binray Basic

VS

Hongqi | H7 2.0T Comfortable

Geely | Binray Basic

VS

Hongqi | H7 3.0T Flagship

Geely | Binray Basic

VS

Hongqi | L5 6.0 V12

Geely | Binray Basic

VS

Hongqi | EQM5 T3 Edition

Geely | Binray Basic

VS

Volkswagen | Jetta 2.0 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Binray Basic has a fuel consumption of 4.81, while HAN AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Binray Basic has a wheelbase of 2670, while HAN AWD has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HAN AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Binray Basic uses No data, while HAN AWD uses All Wheel Drive.