BJ40 2.0T vs CX60 2025 High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1981 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4645 mm
4740
1925 mm
1890
1871 mm
1686
2745 mm
/
532 L
/
220 m
/
/
20 Inch
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12 Inch
✓
✓
Standard LCD
/
6
12
/
Bose
Transmission
Automatic
8-speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.3 L - 3.3 L
218 BHP
280 HP - 284 BHP
Automatic
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
218 BHP
284 BHP
320 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
BJ40 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
CX60 2025 High Plus
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX60 2025 High Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BJ40 2.0T if you care more about overall equipment; choose CX60 2025 High Plus if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BJ40 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BJ40 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2745 mm, while CX60 2025 High Plus has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BJ40 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while CX60 2025 High Plus uses Four-Wheel Drive.