BJ40 2.0T vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
206 km/h
4
4
1981 cc
1984 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4645 mm
4485 mm
1925 mm
1856 mm
1871 mm
1585 mm
2745 mm
2680 mm
532 L
530 L
220 m
170 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
11 Km/L
75 L
60 L
10 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
9
✓
✓
Standard LCD
Android LCD
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
218 BHP
150 BHP - 180 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
218 BHP
180 BHP
320 Nm
320 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
BJ40 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BJ40 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BJ40 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BJ40 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2745 mm, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BJ40 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BJ40 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.