BJ40 PRO Premium Gasoline vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison

Car Information

180

/

Engine / Motor

/

161 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4790

4341 mm

1940

1804 mm

1895(1915)

1693 mm

2760

2676 mm

≥220

/

≥36°

/

≥31°

/

/

414 L

Fuel Economy

/

17.2 Km/L

85

50 L

/

17.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Remote Control Key

/

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

12.8

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Microfiber Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

4

/

/

/

/

Rear-mounted full size

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.8

/

/

10+1 / ○1

/

Transmission

/

8AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Double boom helical spring front independent suspension

/

Mutil-bar non-independent suspension

/

DP-EPS

/

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Fixed and Ventilated disc

/

Fixed and Ventilated disc

/

265/65 R17(HT)

/

265/65 R17(HT)

/

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0T

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

180

115 BHP

386

156 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

7 modes

/

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

/

1.6 L - 2.0 L

/

105 BHP - 135 BHP

/

Automatic & CVT & Manual

/

Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

5 - 5

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • BJ40 PRO Premium Gasoline

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose BJ40 PRO Premium Gasoline if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, BJ40 PRO Premium Gasoline has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, BJ40 PRO Premium Gasoline has a wheelbase of 2760 , while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BJ40 PRO Premium Gasoline, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BJ40 PRO Premium Gasoline uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.