BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 vs Land Cruiser GXR2 DSL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160
/
Dimensions
5
7
2285
/
20 inch
18
4765
5115
1955
1980
1985
1945
2800
/
34
/
27
/
85
/
Fuel Economy
/
13.3
85
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Front Doors
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
Hi Fabric
/
✓
/
Dual
Safety
✓
✓
2
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
7
6
Transmission
✓
/
8AT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
/
Central And Rear
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated
/
Ventilated
/
Hand Brake
/
275/50 R20
265/65 R18
275/50 R20
265/65 R18
✓
/
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
206 - 292
240 BHP - 409
8AT & Automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0
3.3
Gasoline
Diesel
206
302
5500
/
420
700
1600-4000
/
/
V
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Land Cruiser GXR2 DSL
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser GXR2 DSL if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Land Cruiser GXR2 DSL has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Land Cruiser GXR2 DSL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 has a wheelbase of 2800, while Land Cruiser GXR2 DSL has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser GXR2 DSL uses Four-Wheel Drive.